Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKatterine Bonilla-Aldana, D.
dc.contributor.authorHolguin-Rivera, Y.
dc.contributor.authorCortes-Bonilla, I.
dc.contributor.authorCardona-Trujillo, M.C.
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Barco, A.
dc.contributor.authorBedoya-Arias, H.A.
dc.contributor.authorPatiño-Cadavid, L.J.
dc.contributor.authorAguirre-Florez, M.
dc.contributor.authorBalbin-Ramon, G.J.
dc.contributor.authorErazo-Arana, D.C.
dc.contributor.authorZambrano, L.I.
dc.contributor.authorPerez-Garcia, L.
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez-Morales, A.J.
dc.contributor.authorPaniz-Mondolfi, A.
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-31T18:48:19Z
dc.date.available2025-10-31T18:48:19Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12805/6375
dc.description.abstractAvian influenza viruses (AIV) are zoonotic pathogens that can potentially affect humans and potentially be epidemic in a region. Birds (such as poultry and wild birds) serve as potential reservoirs for these viruses, highlighting the importance of determining AIV prevalence in the avian population. No systematic reviews have been published on this issue in the world so far. The present systematic literature review following the PRISMA standard, with meta-analysis, used three databases to globally assess the Influenza H5N6 infection in birds (including poultry and wild birds). A model of random-effects meta-analysis was performed to calculate the pooled prevalence and 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI) for the prevalence of Influenza H5N6 infection in birds. A total number of 14,605 articles published from 2015 to 2020 were retrieved. After screening the abstract/title, 37 articles were selected for full-text assessment, and 15 were included for qualitative and quantitative analyses. Of the total number of birds (n = 13,416 birds), the pool prevalence by RT-PCR was 3.5% (95% CI: 2.8-4.3%). From the total, 39.67% of the birds assessed were ducks (family Anatidae), in which pool prevalence was 7.7% (95% CI: 4.4-11.0). In chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus), the pool prevalence was 3.3% (95% CI 1.9-4.8). Vietnam was the country with the highest pool prevalence; 7.9% (95% CI 4.0-11.7%). Bangladesh was the country with the lowest pool prevalence of 0.4% (95% CI 0.2-0.7%). A considerable proportion of infected birds tested positive highlighted the relevance of individual animals as reservoirs of H5N6. Ducks and chickens were found to be positive by RT-PCR in over 3% of the cases. These data suggest their relevance in maintaining zoonotic transmission and their potential implications for epidemics and even pandemics in the near future.en_US
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherScienceline Publication
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:2322-4568
dc.rightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.subjectSDG 3en_US
dc.subjectInfluenza Virus Dynamics and Vaccination Strategiesen_US
dc.subjectAvian Influenza Virus Dynamics and Implicationsen_US
dc.titlePrevalence of Avian Influenza H5N6 in Birds: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Other Viral Zoonosisen_US
dc.typehttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.54203/scil.2021.wvj20
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.06.02
dc.type.otherResearch article
dc.identifier.journalWorld's Veterinary Journal
dc.type.versionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2