Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHuertas-Zurriaga, A.
dc.contributor.authorPalmieri, P.A.
dc.contributor.authorAguayo-Gonzalez, M.P.
dc.contributor.authorDominguez-Cancino, K.A.
dc.contributor.authorCasanovas-Cuellar, C.
dc.contributor.authorLinden, K.L.V.
dc.contributor.authorCesario, S.K.
dc.contributor.authorEdwards, J.E.
dc.contributor.authorLeyva-Moral, J.M.
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-31T18:48:02Z
dc.date.available2025-10-31T18:48:02Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12805/6357
dc.description.abstractBackground: Black women living with HIV account for a higher proportion of new HIV diagnoses than other groups. These women experience restricted access to reproductive services and inadequate support from healthcare providers because their position in society is based on their sexual health and social identity in the context of this stigmatizing chronic disease. By recognizing the analytical relevance of intersectionality, the reproductive decision-making of Black women can be explored as a social phenomenon of society with varied positionality. Objective: The purpose of this review was to synthesize the evidence about the reproductive decision-making of Black women living with HIV in high-income countries from the beginning of the HIV epidemic to the present. Methods: This systematic review was guided by the JBI evidence synthesis recommendations. Searches were completed in seven databases from 1985 to 2021, and the review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420180919). Results: Of 3503 records, 22 studies were chosen for synthesis, including 19 observational and three qualitative designs. Nearly, all studies originated from the United States; the earliest was reported in 1995. Few studies provided detailed sociodemographic data or subgroup analysis focused on race or ethnicity. Influencing factors for reproductive decision-making were organized into the following seven categories: ethnicity, race, and pregnancy; religion and spirituality; attitudes and beliefs about antiretroviral therapy; supportive people; motherhood and fulfillment; reproductive planning; and health and wellness. Conclusion: No major differences were identified in the reproductive decision-making of Black women living with HIV. Even though Black women were the largest group of women living with HIV, no studies reported a subgroup analysis, and few studies detailed sociodemographic information specific to Black women. In the future, institutional review boards should require a subgroup analysis for Black women when they are included as participants in larger studies of women living with HIV.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding text 1: The authors appreciate the continued guidance and support provided by the Joanna Briggs Institute (University of Adelaide) and the Evidence-Based Health Care South America: A JBI Affiliated Group. The authors also recongize thank Deborah Goggin, MA, ELS, scientific writer from the Department of Research Support at A.T. Still University, for her excellent editorial review. Finally, the authors are truly grateful to all the Black women living with HIV who took the time to share their experiences and to complete the surveys for the research studies included in this review. The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The dissemination of this study was funded by the Dirección de Desarrollo de la Investigación, Universidad Norbert Wiener (Grant number: VRI-D-2021-06-002-RDG). The funding agency had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the manuscript. All authors had full access to the data for the study. The primary, corresponding, and last authors had the final responsibility for the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.; Funding text 2: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The dissemination of this study was funded by the Dirección de Desarrollo de la Investigación, Universidad Norbert Wiener (Grant number: VRI-D-2021-06-002-RDG). The funding agency had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the manuscript. All authors had full access to the data for the study. The primary, corresponding, and last authors had the final responsibility for the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSAGE Publications
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:1745-5057
dc.rightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.subjectSDG 3en_US
dc.subjectSDG 5en_US
dc.subjectHIV Prevention and Care Strategies for Communitiesen_US
dc.subjectIntegrating Family Planning and HIV Servicesen_US
dc.titleReproductive decision-making of Black women living with HIV: A systematic reviewen_US
dc.typehttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bc
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/17455057221090827
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.03.05
dc.type.otherReview
dc.identifier.journalWomen's Health
dc.type.versionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2