Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFernandez-Guzman, D.
dc.contributor.authorLavarello, R.
dc.contributor.authorYglesias-González, M.
dc.contributor.authorHartinger, S.M.
dc.contributor.authorRojas-Rueda, D.
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-31T18:47:36Z
dc.date.available2025-10-31T18:47:36Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12805/6331
dc.description.abstractThe accelerated production of greenhouse gases (GHG) due to human activity has led to unprecedented global warming, making climate mitigation strategies crucial for minimizing its impacts. South America, a region highly vulnerable to climate change, stands to benefit from implementing such strategies to reduce future risks and generate health co-benefits. This scoping review, aimed to assess the existing evidence on the health benefits of climate mitigation strategies in South American countries. PubMed, Web of Science, and LILACS databases were searched until June 15, 2023. Nine studies published between 2001 and 2021 were analyzed, focusing on Brazil, Chile, and Bolivia. All the studies identified in this review used scenario modeling. They evaluated various GHG emission mitigation strategies, including land management, reducing livestock production, biofuel production, increased active transportation, renewable energy, and waste reduction. Only one study looked at GHG capture and sequestration through afforestation. Given the limited information available, there is a pressing need for more research on the region's potential health, environmental, and economic co-benefits. This review serves as a starting point and suggests that climate mitigation can offer a range of positive co-benefits, such as improved air quality and increased resilience to climate impacts, thereby advancing public health initiatives. Funding: MYG was supported by the Wellcome Trust (grant number 209734/Z/17/Z). The other authors did not receive financial support for their research or authorship. The publication of this article was financially supported by Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding text 1: MYG was supported by the Wellcome Trust (grant number 209734/Z/17/Z). The other authors did not receive financial support for their research or authorship. The publication of this article was financially supported by Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia.; Funding text 2: Funding : MYG was supported by the Wellcome Trust (grant number 209734/Z/17/Z). The other authors did not receive financial support for their research or authorship. The publication of this article was financially supported by Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:2667-193X
dc.rightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.subjectSDG 3en_US
dc.subjectSDG 7en_US
dc.subjectSDG 8en_US
dc.subjectSDG 13en_US
dc.subjectSDG 15en_US
dc.subjectMercury Dynamics in Environmental and Health Contextsen_US
dc.subjectSustainable Food Systems and Environmental Impacten_US
dc.titleA scoping review of the health co-benefits of climate mitigation strategies in South Americaen_US
dc.typehttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bc
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2023.100602
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.05.08
dc.type.otherReview
dc.identifier.journalThe Lancet Regional Health - Americas
dc.type.versionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2