Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBonilla-Aldana, D.K.
dc.contributor.authorTrejos-Mendoza, A.E.
dc.contributor.authorPérez-Vargas, S.
dc.contributor.authorRivera-Casas, E.
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz-Lara, F.
dc.contributor.authorZambrano, L.I.
dc.contributor.authorArteaga-Livias, K.
dc.contributor.authorUlloque-Badaracco, J.R.
dc.contributor.authorAlarcon-Braga, E.A.
dc.contributor.authorHernandez-Bustamante, E.A.
dc.contributor.authorAl-kassab-Córdova, A.
dc.contributor.authorBenites-Zapata, V.A.
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez-Morales, A.J.
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-31T18:46:25Z
dc.date.available2025-10-31T18:46:25Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12805/6250
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Bovine brucellosis is a significant public health problem in countries with economic and zoonotic implications. Although relevant, there are no previous systematic reviews about bovine brucellosis in Latin America. Methods: We performed a systematic literature review in five data-bases to assess the seroprevalence of Brucella in cattle. A meta-analysis with a random-effects model was performed to calculate the pooled prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). In addition, measures of heterogeneity (Cochran's Q statistic and I2 test) were reported. Results: The literature search yielded 3,403 articles, of which 65 studies were fully valid for analysis. The pooled seroprevalence for Brucella in bovine (n ​= ​46,883,177) was 4.0% (95%CI: 3.0%–5.0%; p ​< ​0.001), and Venezuela was the country with the highest prevalence (16.0%). By regions, the highest seroprevalence is in Central America and the Caribbean islands (8.0%,95%CI: 3.0%–15.0%; p ​< ​0.001, I2 ​= ​99.85). Conclusions: Some countries reported still relevant seroprevalences of bovine brucellosis, especially at the Central America and Caribbean islands. Multiple factors may influence the survival and spread of pathogens in the environment; farms located in regions bordering forest areas, in areas of difficult access to the veterinary service; extensive beef herds raised at pastures with different age and productive groups inter-mingled, and minimal concerns regarding hygiene practices and disease prevention measures. Bovine brucellosis has not been eliminated and needs to be considered with new tools for prevention and control, especially being a zoonosis.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFrom the Research Unit, Universidad Continental, Huancayo, Peru, for funding the APC of this article. Study sponsors had no role in the study design, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, the writing of the manuscript, and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:2052-2975
dc.rightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.subjectCausal Inference and Estimation in Health Researchen_US
dc.subjectBrucellosis Prevalence and Economic Impact in Brazilen_US
dc.titleA systematic review and meta-analysis of bovine brucellosis seroprevalence in Latin America and the Caribbeanen_US
dc.typehttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bc
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmni.2023.101168
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.06.01
dc.type.otherReview
dc.identifier.journalNew Microbes and New Infections
dc.type.versionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2