Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDE MARCO, G.
dc.contributor.authorLanza, A.
dc.contributor.authorCristache, C.M.
dc.contributor.authorCapcha, E.B.
dc.contributor.authorEspinoza, K.I.
dc.contributor.authorRullo, R.
dc.contributor.authorVernal, R.
dc.contributor.authorCafferata, E.A.
dc.contributor.authorDi Francesco, F.
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-31T18:45:45Z
dc.date.available2025-10-31T18:45:45Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12805/6207
dc.description.abstractThird molar removal surgery usually comes accompanied by postoperative discomfort, which could be influenced by the surgical approach chosen. This scoping systematic review aimed at compiling the available evidence focused on the influence of flap design, including envelope flap (EF), triangular flap (TF), and modified triangular flap (MTF), on postoperative pain, swelling, and trismus, as primary outcome measures, and any result mentioning healing promotion or delay, as secondary outcome measure, after mandibular third molar extraction surgery. An electronic search, complemented by a manual search, of articles published from 1999 to 2020 was conducted in the Medline (PubMed), EMBASE and Web of Science databases including human randomized controlled trials, prospective, and retrospective studies with at least 15 patients. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed either with the Cochrane’s Risk of Bias tool or with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Every step of the review was performed independently and in duplicate. The initial electronic search recovered 2102 articles. After applying the inclusion criteria, 12 articles were included. For patient’s perceived postoperative pain, TF and MTF frequently reported better results than EF. For swelling, the literature is divided, despite a trend favoring EF. For trismus, data showed that its occurrence is mostly associated with the duration of the surgery rather than with the chosen flap. For healing, the limited data is inconclusive. Finally, randomized studies showed a high risk of bias, whereas nonrandomized studies were mostly of good quality and low risk of bias. Although there was no clear consensus regarding the influence of different flap designs for third mandibular molar extraction on postoperative clinical morbidities; the surgeon’s experience, estimated surgical difficulty, molar position and orientation, and surg ery duration should be considered when choosing among the different flap designs.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEAC was a recipient of a PhD Scholarship from the Graduate School of the Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de Chile.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherFaculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Universidade de Sao Paulo
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:1678-7765
dc.rightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.subjectEndodontics and Dental Regenerationen_US
dc.subjectComplications and Management of Third Molar Extractionsen_US
dc.titleThe influence of flap design on patients’ experiencing pain, swelling, and trismus after mandibular third molar surgery: A scoping systematic reviewen_US
dc.typehttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bc
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2020-0932
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.14
dc.type.otherReview
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Applied Oral Science
dc.type.versionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2