Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDiaz-Arocutipa, C.
dc.contributor.authorBenites-Meza, J.K.
dc.contributor.authorChambergo-Michilot, D.
dc.contributor.authorBarboza, J.J.
dc.contributor.authorPasupuleti, V.
dc.contributor.authorBueno, H.
dc.contributor.authorSambola, A.
dc.contributor.authorHernandez, A.V.
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-31T18:45:00Z
dc.date.available2025-10-31T18:45:00Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12805/6157
dc.description.abstractBackground: Inflammation plays a key role in atherosclerotic plaque destabilization and adverse cardiac remodeling. Recent evidence has shown a promising role of colchicine in patients with coronary artery disease. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of colchicine in post–acute myocardial infarction (MI) patients. Methods: We searched five electronic databases from inception to January 18, 2021, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating colchicine in post–acute MI patients. Primary outcomes were cardiovascular mortality and recurrent MI. Secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, stroke, urgent coronary revascularization, levels of follow-up high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and drug-related adverse events. All meta-analyses used inverse-variance random-effects models. Results: Six RCTs involving 6,005 patients were included. Colchicine did not significantly reduce cardiovascular mortality [risk ratio (RR), 0.91; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.52–1.61; p = 0.64], recurrent MI (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.62–1.22; p = 0.28), all-cause mortality (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.61–1.85; p = 0.78), stroke (RR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.07–1.09; p = 0.05), urgent coronary revascularization (RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.02–8.89; p = 0.19), or decreased levels of follow-up hs-CRP (mean difference, −1.95 mg/L; 95% CI, −12.88 to 8.98; p = 0.61) compared to the control group. There was no increase in any adverse events (RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.89–1.07; p = 0.34) or gastrointestinal adverse events (RR, 2.49; 95% CI, 0.48–12.99; p = 0.20). Subgroup analyses by colchicine dose (0.5 vs. 1 mg/day), time of follow-up (<1 vs. ≥1 year), and treatment duration (≤30 vs. >30 days) showed no changes in the overall findings. Conclusion: In post–acute MI patients, colchicine does not reduce cardiovascular or all-cause mortality, recurrent MI, or other cardiovascular outcomes. Also, colchicine did not increase drug-related adverse events.en_US
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherFrontiers Media
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:2297-055X
dc.rightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.subjectSDG 3en_US
dc.subjectPrognostic Factors in Cancer and Inflammationen_US
dc.subjectColchicine's Role in Cardiovascular Disease Managementen_US
dc.titleEfficacy and Safety of Colchicine in Post–acute Myocardial Infarction Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trialsen_US
dc.typehttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bc
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.676771
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.04
dc.type.otherReview
dc.identifier.journalFrontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
dc.type.versionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2