Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVera-Ponce, V.J.
dc.contributor.authorGarcia-Lara, R.A.
dc.contributor.authorTorres-Malca, J.R.
dc.contributor.authorLoayza-Castro, J.A.
dc.contributor.authorRamirez-Ortega, A.P.
dc.contributor.authorZuzunaga-Montoya, F.E.
dc.contributor.authorPaucar, C.R.I.
dc.contributor.authorDe La Cruz-Vargas, J.A.
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-31T18:42:49Z
dc.date.available2025-10-31T18:42:49Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12805/5999
dc.description.abstractBackground: In situations with economic issues and limited resources, prevention and early detection of hypertension are essential for its control. Diagnosis and treatment require considerable expenses, which could lead to an incomplete diagnosis and, therefore, a higher prevalence. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of eight biochemical indices as diagnostic tools for prehypertension and hypertension. Methods: This is a diagnostic testing study. The variables were hypertension and prehypertension. Among the markers evaluated were triglycerides/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), cholesterol/HDL-C, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)/HDL-C, visceral adiposity index, lipid accumulation product, the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index, TyG-waist circumference (TyG-WC), and TyG-body mass index (TyG-BMI). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used as a statistical and graphical method to evaluate diagnostic capacity, as well as the area under the curve (AUC) corresponding to each response variable. Sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) were calculated, along with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Results: The prevalence of undiagnosed prehypertension and hypertension was 6.88% and 2.72%, respectively. The TyG-WC has been the best indicator for both prehypertension: AUC = 0.712 (95% CI: 0.650-0.775), cutoff = 762.56, Se = 90.74 (95% CI: 79.70-96.92), and Sp = 45.24 (95% CI: 41.61-48.92), in terms of diagnostic capacity. The same applies to hypertension: AUC = 0.801 (95% CI: 0.718-0.883), cutoff = 862.57, Se = 81.81 (95% CI: 59.72-94.81), and Sp = 70.18 (95% CI: 66.84-73.35). Conclusions: The TyG-WC is the best diagnostic tool for prehypertension and hypertension; hence, it is necessary to conduct prospective research to verify these findings. If confirmed, the TyG-WC can be used as a marker for the prognosis of these two conditions and, thus, to make decisions about prevention.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors of this study wish to extend their gratitude to the Institute of Biomedical Science Research at Ricardo Palma University for the support provided in the development of this work.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElmer Press
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:1923-2861
dc.rightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.subjectInnovative Approaches in Diabetes Management and Monitoringen_US
dc.subjectTriglyceride-Glucose Index and Insulin Resistanceen_US
dc.titleTriglyceride Glucose-Waist Circumference Is Superior to Other Biochemical Indicators for Diagnosing Prehypertension and Hypertensionen_US
dc.typehttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.14740/jem886
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.18
dc.type.otherResearch article
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Endocrinology and Metabolism
dc.type.versionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2