| dc.contributor.author | Vera-Ponce, V.J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Zuzunaga-Montoya, F.E. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Loayza-Castro, J.A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ramirez-Ortega, A.P. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Torres-Malca, J.R. | |
| dc.contributor.author | García-Lara, R.A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Paucar, C.R.I. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Valladares-Garrido, M.J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | De La Cruz-Vargas, J.A. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-31T18:42:45Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-10-31T18:42:45Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12805/5994 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Introduction: Prediabetes is a significant public health concern due to its high risk of progressing to diabetes. Anthropometric measures of obesity, including body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) have been demonstrated as key risk factors in the development of prediabetes. However, there is a lack of clarity on the diagnostic accuracy and cut-off points of these measures. Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of these anthropometric measures for their most effective use in identifying prediabetes. Methodology: A systematic review (SR) with metanalysis of observational studies was carried out. The search was conducted in four databases: Pubmed/Medline, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and EMBASE. For the meta-analysis, sensitivity and specificity, together with their 95% confidence intervals (CI 95%) were calculated. Results: Among all the manuscripts chosen for review, we had four cross-sectional studies, and three were classified as cohort studies. The forest plots showed the combined sensitivity and specificity for both cross-sectional and cohort studies. For cross-sectional studies, the values were as follows: BMI had a sensitivity of 0.63 and specificity of 0.56, WC had a sensitivity of 0.59 and specificity of 0.58, and WHtR had a sensitivity of 0.63 and specificity of 0.73. In the cohort studies, the combined sensitivity and specificity were: BMI at 0.70 and 0.45, WC at 0.68 and 0.56, and WHtR at 0.68 and 0.56, respectively. All values are provided with 95% confidence intervals. Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of BMI, WC, and WHtR in identifying prediabetes. The results showed variations in sensitivity and specificity, with WHtR having the highest specificity in cross-sectional studies and BMI having improved sensitivity in cohort studies. | en_US |
| dc.description.sponsorship | This study did not receive funding from public or non-public organization. | |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Lifescience Global | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | urn:issn:1929-6029 | |
| dc.rights | https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject | SDG 3 | en_US |
| dc.subject | Obesity, Metabolic Health, and Quality of Life | en_US |
| dc.subject | Obesity Risk Factors and Anthropometric Indices | en_US |
| dc.title | Diagnostic Accuracy of Anthropometric Markers of Obesity for Prediabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis | en_US |
| dc.type | https://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2023.12.15 | |
| dc.subject.ocde | https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.18 | |
| dc.type.other | Research article | |
| dc.identifier.journal | International Journal of Statistics in Medical Research | |
| dc.type.version | https://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |