Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRodriguez-Calienes, A.
dc.contributor.authorBorjas-Calderón, N.F.
dc.contributor.authorVivanco-Suarez, J.
dc.contributor.authorZila-Velasque, J.P.
dc.contributor.authorChavez-Malpartida, S.S.
dc.contributor.authorTerry, F.
dc.contributor.authorGrados-Espinoza, P.
dc.contributor.authorSaal-Zapata, G.
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-31T18:42:03Z
dc.date.available2025-10-31T18:42:03Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12805/5939
dc.description.abstractObjective: We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of microsurgical clipping versus endovascular treatment (EVT) for paraclinoid aneurysms. Methods: A systematic search for studies including patients with paraclinoid aneurysms treated with a microsurgical or endovascular technique was conducted in 6 databases from inception to February 2022. Efficacy outcomes included complete angiographic occlusion at last follow-up, favorable functional outcome, and recurrence of the aneurysm. For safety, we assessed a composite of intraoperative and postoperative complications. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. Results: A total of 95 studies including 6711 patients, 3029 in the surgical group and 3682 in the EVT group were found. Pooled rates of complete occlusion were 94% (95% CI 91%–96%; I2 = 0%) in the surgical group and 69% (95% CI 63%–74%; I2 = 79%) in the EVT group, respectively. The favorable functional outcome rate was 86% (95% CI 76%–92%; I2 = 72%) with surgical treatment and 95% (95% CI 92%–97%; I2 = 61%) with EVT. The rate of aneurysm recurrence with surgical treatment was 1% (95% CI 0%–4%; I2 = 0%) and 12% (95% CI 9%–16%; I2 = 57%) with EVT. The composite safety outcome rate in the surgical group was 24% (95% CI 18%–30%; I2 = 90%) and 10% (95% CI 8%–13%; I2 = 71%) in the EVT group. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that microsurgical clipping seems to have a higher efficacy than EVT in terms of angiographic occlusion and aneurysm recurrence; however, EVT seems to be safer in terms of intraoperative and postoperative complications. Considering the heterogeneity and low-level evidence of the data available, further prospective randomized studies are warranted to confirm our findings.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipConflict of interest statement: The authors declare that the article content was composed in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:1878-8769
dc.rightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.subjectCerebral Aneurysm and Vascular Treatmentsen_US
dc.subjectAnatomical Insights into Aneurysms and Optic Structuresen_US
dc.titleEndovascular Treatment and Microsurgical Clipping for the Management of Paraclinoid Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysisen_US
dc.typehttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2023.07.108
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.01.04
dc.type.otherResearch article
dc.identifier.journalWorld Neurosurgery
dc.type.versionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2