Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlvitez-Temoche, D.
dc.contributor.authorMendoza, R.
dc.contributor.authorCalderón, I.
dc.contributor.authorSalcedo-Moncada, D.
dc.contributor.authorWatanabe, R.
dc.contributor.authorMayta-Tovalino, F.
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-31T18:42:01Z
dc.date.available2025-10-31T18:42:01Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12805/5936
dc.description.abstractAim: To compare the bond strength of fiberglass posts luted with different adhesive luting protocols. Materials and methods: Thirty bovine teeth that underwent endodontic treatment were used. The crowns were removed, and the root canals were prepared. In the first group, the posts were cemented with an etch-and-rinse protocol with universal adhesive and resin cement; for the second group, a self-etching protocol with universal adhesive and resin cement was adopted; for the third group, a protocol with self-adhesive cement was adopted. The roots of the teeth were sectioned into 2-mm thick specimens, corresponding to the middle, cervical, and apical thirds of the space prepared for the post. The specimens were pushed out using a universal testing machine. The normality of the data was tested by the Shapiro–Wilk test, and statistical analyses included ANOVA and Bonferroni test. Results: The mean adhesion force was 21.2 ± 4.7 MPa in the first group, 22.6 ± 5.1 MPa in the second, and 12.3 ± 2.1 MPa in the third group. At the cervical level, the mean adhesion force was 17.5 ± 5.2 MPa, at the level of the middle third, it was 17.7 MPa ± 5.4, and at the apical level, 21.0 ± 7.3 MPa. Conclusions: There were no significant differences in the mean adhesion’s forces between groups 1 and 2, while the values of group 3 were significantly lower than those of the other groups. Clinical significance: This research allows us to know the impact of bonding systems on the different cementation protocols for fiberglass posts.en_US
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherJaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:0976-6014
dc.rightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.subjectMechanical Strength and Bonding in Dental Materialsen_US
dc.subjectMechanical Strength of Fiber Post and Core Restorationsen_US
dc.titleComparison of Bond Strength of Luted Fiberglass Posts with Different Cementation Protocols: A Comparative In Vitro Studyen_US
dc.typehttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1886
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.14
dc.type.otherResearch article
dc.identifier.journalWorld Journal of Dentistry
dc.type.versionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2