Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCarrillo-Larco, R.M.
dc.contributor.authorGuzman-Vilca, W.C.
dc.contributor.authorBernabe-Ortiz, A.
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-31T18:41:18Z
dc.date.available2025-10-31T18:41:18Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12805/5887
dc.description.abstractBackground: While there is a growing interest in antihypertensive medication rates among people with hypertension in low- and middle-income countries, little has been described about antihypertensive medication rates among eligible people based on the absolute cardiovascular risk approach. Following the risk-based approach, we described the proportion of eligible people receiving antihypertensive medication in Peru. Methods: Analysis of six (2015-2020) national health surveys. Absolute cardiovascular risk was computed with the 2019 WHO cardiovascular risk charts and based on local guidelines. Antihypertensive treatment allocation based on the absolute cardiovascular risk was defined using the Package of essential noncommunicable (PEN) disease interventions for primary health care in low-resource settings and the HEARTS guidelines by the WHO; we also followed the recommendations by local guidelines. Results: There were 120,059 people. Overall, according to the local guidelines the 17.9% of the population would be eligible for antihypertensive medication while this estimate was 8.1% based on the WHO guidelines. At the national level, depending on the guidelines, we observed a steady trend of eligible people receiving antihypertension medication (e.g., men, local guidelines), a decreasing trend (e.g., men, <60, local guidelines) or an increasing trend (e.g., men, ≥60, local guidelines). At the sub-national level, seventeen regions showed an increasing antihypertensive treatment rate based on the local guidelines; when based on the WHO guidelines, eleven regions showed a decreasing rate. Conclusions: Peru needs to define a tool for surveillance of absolute cardiovascular risk and to monitor antihypertensive treatment allocation among high-risk people. Funding: Wellcome Trust (214185/Z/18/Z).en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe dataset used in the analysis is available as supplementary material, along with the analysis code in R and STATA. Wellcome Trust (214185/Z/18/Z).
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:2667-193X
dc.rightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.subjectSDG 3en_US
dc.subjectHypertension Management and Dietary Sodium Impacten_US
dc.subjectHypertension Control and Public Health Impacten_US
dc.titleRisk-based antihypertensive treatment allocation in Peru: comparison of local and international guidelines analysing national health surveys between 2015-2020en_US
dc.typehttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2021.100022
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.04
dc.type.otherResearch article
dc.identifier.journalThe Lancet Regional Health - Americas
dc.type.versionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2