Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMenacho-Mendoza, E.
dc.contributor.authorCedamanos-Cuenca, R.
dc.contributor.authorDíaz-Suyo, A.
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-31T18:40:56Z
dc.date.available2025-10-31T18:40:56Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12805/5857
dc.description.abstractObjective: The purpose of this study was to compare the stress distribution and the factor of safety of three dental implant systems using the finite element method. Materials and methods: Three commercial dental implant systems were designed using Solid Works 2020 software: Model A with an internal octagonal connection and matching platform, Model B with an internal hexagon connection and switching platform, and Model C with an internal 15° conical-cylindrical connection and switching platform. A 200 N load was applied to each design in both axial and 30° oblique directions using the finite element method. Results: In the three dental implant systems, the maximum von Mises stress was concentrated at the cervical level of the bone-implant interface in all models. Model C showed lower maximum stress values in both axial and 30° oblique loads. The highest maximum stress value was observed with the application of the oblique load in all the study models, and the factor of safety was less than one in Model A when subjected to a 200 N oblique load. Conclusion: The switching platform models generated lower maximum stress values and a factor of safety higher than one which is considered an acceptable value. Clinical relevance: A dental implant system with an internal hexagon or conical connection and a switching platform generates lower maximum von Mises stress values both on the implant components and on the peri-implant tissues.en_US
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:1013-9052
dc.rightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.subjectImplant Innovations in Orthodontics and Bone Healthen_US
dc.subjectImplant Success Factors in Dental Prostheticsen_US
dc.titleStress analysis and factor of safety in three dental implant systems by finite element analysisen_US
dc.typehttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2022.08.006
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.00.00
dc.type.otherResearch article
dc.identifier.journalSaudi Dental Journal
dc.type.versionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2