Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMeneses, E.C.
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-31T18:40:08Z
dc.date.available2025-10-31T18:40:08Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12805/5789
dc.description.abstractThe author analyzes the Peruvian Constitutional Court’s ruling on the unconstitutionality of the law eliminating the CAS regime, discussing its content and omissions. In this regard, the judgement is compared with international regulations and doctrinal perspectives related to economic, social, cultural, and environmental rights to demonstrate that Peru fails to comply with its international commitments regarding public employment. Finally, he offers his opinion on the ruling.en_US
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Autónoma de Chile
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:0719-9392
dc.rightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.subjectJustice and Democracy in Legal Frameworksen_US
dc.subjectFundamental Rights and Legal Frameworks in Brazilen_US
dc.titleDesigualdad y empleo público, comentarios a la Sentencia del Tribunal Constitucional sobre la inconstitucionalidad de la Ley No 31131es_PE
dc.typehttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.32457/rjyd.v6i2.2170
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.01
dc.type.otherResearch article
dc.identifier.journalRevista Justicia y Derecho
dc.type.versionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2