| dc.contributor.author | Chumpitaz-Cerrate, V. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Caldas-Cueva, V. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Franco-Quino, C.I. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chávez-Rimache, L.K. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-31T18:40:04Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-10-31T18:40:04Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1729-519X2020000700011 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12805/5784 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Introduction: The alkalinization of lidocaine has been successful in blocking the inferior dental nerve; however, there are contradictory results regarding its clinical efficacy. Objective: To determine the effect of 2% lidocaine with 1: 80,000 adrenaline alkalinized with 8.4% sodium bicarbonate on inferior dental nerve block. Material and methods: Experimental, prospective and longitudinal study that comprised 50 patients from the Dental School of the National University of San Marcos. The following solutions were administered for inferior dental nerve block: 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1: 80,000 alkalinized with 8.4% sodium bicarbonate and 2% lidocaine with 1: 80,000 adrenaline not alkalinized. Pain intensity was evaluated by injection, hemodynamic parameters and anesthetic periods (time of onset of action and duration of the anesthetic effect). Results: There was a lower pain intensity due to injection in the alkalized lidocaine group (19.16 ± 2.7) compared to the non-alkalinized lidocaine group (22.88 ± 4.2); p=0.02. Likewise, the onset time of action was lower in the alkalized lidocaine group (105.72 ± 9.7) compared to the non-alkalinized lidocaine group (157.52 ± 12.1); p=0.002. However, no significant differences were found in the hemodynamic parameters (p>0.05) and the duration of the anesthetic effect (p=0.114). Conclusions: Lidocaine 2% with adrenaline 1: 80,000 alkalized with sodium bicarbonate at 8.4% on the block of the inferior dental nerve produces a decrease in pain intensity due to injection and the time of onset of action, compared to the non-alkalinized formulation. However, there are no differences in relation to the hemodynamic parameters or the duration of the anesthetic effect. | en_US |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.language.iso | spa | |
| dc.publisher | Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de La Habana | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | urn:issn:1729-519X | |
| dc.rights | https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject | Innovative Techniques in Nasal and Mandibular Surgery | en_US |
| dc.subject | Comparative Efficacy of Local Anesthetics in Dentistry | en_US |
| dc.title | Lidocaína 2 % con adrenalina 1:80000 alcalinizada con bicarbonato de sodio 8,4 % en la anestesia Dental | es_PE |
| dc.title.alternative | Lidocaine 2% with adrenaline 1: 80,000 alkalinized with sodium bicarbonate 8.4 % in dental anesthesia | en_US |
| dc.type | https://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 | |
| dc.subject.ocde | https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.14 | |
| dc.type.other | Research article | |
| dc.identifier.journal | Revista Habanera de Ciencias Medicas | |
| dc.type.version | https://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |