Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVera-Ponce, V.J.
dc.contributor.authorZeñas-Trujillo, G.Z.
dc.contributor.authorLoayza-Castro, J.A.
dc.contributor.authorZuzunaga-Montoya, F.E.
dc.contributor.authorValladares-Garrido, M.J.
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-31T18:39:57Z
dc.date.available2025-10-31T18:39:57Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12805/5773
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Given the increase in cases of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) worldwide, and the limited access to laboratory analysis in several places, it is necessary to have the implementation of a simple, fast, and without-detection method. laboratory: the American Diabetes Association (ADA) risk test: the ADA test risk score (ADATRS). Objective: To carry out a systematic review (SR) with meta-analysis on the diagnostic utility of the ADATRS for prediabetes and DM2. Methodology: SR with meta-analysis of studies of diagnostic tests. The search was conducted in four databases: PubMed/Medline, SCOPUS, Web of Science and EMBASE. True positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives were obtained for each study. 2×2 tables were constructed based on the information from the article or from the authors. Thus, forest diagrams were presented with a 95% confidence interval (95%CI), both for the overall sensitivity and specificity of the ADATRS for both events of interest. Results: Forest plots revealed that the sensitivity and specificity for prediabetes were 0.91 (95%CI: 0.82-0.96) and 0.52 (95%CI: 0.36-0.67), respectively. While for DM2, the combined sensitivity and specificity were 0.85 (95%CI: 0.71-0.93) and 0.56 (95%CI: 0.47-0.65), respectively. Conclusions: Our systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature suggests that the ADATRS may be useful as a screening method for prediabetes and DM2, given its high sensitivity. However, there is a lot of heterogeneity and few studies even in this regard; therefore, more research work is needed in different populations and with more standardized methods to finally determine the clinical importance of this questionnaire as a screening or diagnostic tool for prediabetes or DM2.en_US
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherAsociación Española de Dietistas-Nutricionistas
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:2173-1292
dc.rightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.subjectSDG 3en_US
dc.subjectInnovative Approaches in Diabetes Management and Monitoringen_US
dc.subjectDiabetes Risk Assessment and Prevention Strategiesen_US
dc.titleUtilidad diagnóstica de la prueba de riesgo de la Asociación Americana de Diabetes para prediabetes y diabetes. Una revisión sistemática y metaanálisises_PE
dc.typehttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.14306/renhyd.27.3.1915
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.18
dc.type.otherResearch article
dc.identifier.journalRevista Espanola de Nutricion Humana y Dietetica
dc.type.versionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2