Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFreitas, V.
dc.contributor.authorLi, X.
dc.contributor.authorAmitai, Y.
dc.contributor.authorAu, F.
dc.contributor.authorKulkarni, S.
dc.contributor.authorGhai, S.
dc.contributor.authorMulligan, A.M.
dc.contributor.authorBromley, M.
dc.contributor.authorSiepmann, T.
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-31T18:37:56Z
dc.date.available2025-10-31T18:37:56Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12805/5572
dc.description.abstractBackground: The diagnostic value of screening the contralateral breast with MRI in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer is poorly understood. Purpose: To assess the impact of MRI for screening the contralateral breast on long-term outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer and to determine whether subgroups with unfavorable prognoses would benefit from MRI in terms of survival. Materials and Methods: Data on consecutive patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer seen from January 2008 to December 2010 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, previous breast cancer, distant metastasis, absence of contralateral mammography at diagnosis, and no planned surgical treatment were excluded. Groups that did and did not undergo preoperative MRI were compared. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method for propensity score-matched groups to estimate cause-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). A marginal Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate association of MRI and clinicopathologic variables with OS. Results: Of 1846 patients, 1199 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Median follow-up time was 10 years (range, 0-14 years). The 2:1 matched sample comprised 705 patients (470 in the MRI group and 235 in the no-MRI group); median ages at surgery were 59 years (range, 31-87 years) and 64 years (range, 37-92 years), respectively. MRI depicted contralateral synchronous disease more frequently (27 of 470 patients [5.7%] vs five of 235 patients [2.1%]; P = .047) and was associated with a higher OS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.51; 95% CI: 1.25, 5.06; P = .01). No differences were observed between groups in metachronous disease rate (MRI group: 21 of 470 patients [4.5%]; no-MRI group: 10 of 235 patients [4.3%]; P > .99) or CSS (HR, 1.34; 95% CI: 0.56, 3.21; P = .51). MRI benefit was greater in patients with larger tumor sizes (>2 cm) (HR, 2.58; 95% CI: 1.11, 5.99; P = .03) and histologic grade III tumors (HR, 2.94; 95% CI: 1.18, 7.32; P = .02). Conclusion: Routine MRI screening of the contralateral breast after first diagnosis of breast cancer improved overall survival; the most pronounced benefit was found in patients with larger primary tumor size and primary tumors of histologic grade III.en_US
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherRadiological Society of North America
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:1527-1315
dc.rightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.subjectSDG 3en_US
dc.subjectBreast Cancer Detection and Treatment Innovationsen_US
dc.subjectMagnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Cancer Evaluationen_US
dc.titleContralateral Breast Screening with Preoperative MRI: Long-term Outcomes for Newly Diagnosed Breast Canceren_US
dc.typehttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.212361
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.21
dc.type.otherResearch article
dc.identifier.journalRadiology
dc.type.versionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2