Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorde la Cruz-Ku, G.
dc.contributor.authorChambergo-Michilot, D.
dc.contributor.authorSmith Torres-Roman, J.
dc.contributor.authorRebaza, P.
dc.contributor.authorPinto, J.
dc.contributor.authorAraujo, J.
dc.contributor.authorMorante, Z.
dc.contributor.authorEnriquez, D.
dc.contributor.authorFlores, C.
dc.contributor.authorLuque, R.
dc.contributor.authorSaavedra, A.
dc.contributor.authorLujan, M.
dc.contributor.authorGomez, H.
dc.contributor.authorValcarcel, B.
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-31T18:37:38Z
dc.date.available2025-10-31T18:37:38Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12805/5542
dc.description.abstractBackground The aim of this study was to determine the utility of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a biomarker for predicting early-mortality (<2 years) among females with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). Methods We reviewed 118 medical records of females with mTNBC. The cut-off value for the NLR (<2.5 and ≥2.5) was determined with receiver operating characteristic curves (area under the curve: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.62–0.85). Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the Log-rank test. Multivariate Cox regression was used to identify the risk of mortality at two years. Moreover, we performed sensitivity analyses with different cut-off values and a subgroup analysis in females that only received chemotherapy. Results The median follow-up was 24 months. Females with NLR ≥2.5 had a poor overall survival compared to females with NLR <2.5 (6% vs. 28%, p<0.001) at two years. This outcome remained when we stratified for females that only received chemotherapy (8% vs. 36%, p = 0.001). Multivariate analyses identified NLR ≥2.5 as a poor prognostic risk factor for mortality in the entire population (HR: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.32–3.39) and among females that received chemotherapy (HR: 2.68, 95% CI: 1.46–4.92). Conclusion The NLR is an accessible and reliable biomarker that predicts early mortality among females with mTNBC. Our results suggest that females with high NLR values have poor prognosis despite receiving standard chemotherapy. Health providers should evaluate the possibility to enroll these patients in novel immunotherapy trials.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors received no specific funding for this work. We thank the personnel of the Medical Oncology Department of the National Institute of Neoplastic Diseases for encouraging us to successfully complete our study. We also thank the Universidad Científica del Sur’s editing services for reviewing our paper.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:1932-6203
dc.rightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.subjectSDG 3en_US
dc.subjectPrognostic Factors in Cancer and Inflammationen_US
dc.subjectInflammation-Based Prognostic Ratios in Cancer Outcomesen_US
dc.titleNeutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts early mortality in females with metastatic triple-negative breast canceren_US
dc.typehttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243447
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.21
dc.type.otherResearch article
dc.identifier.journalPLoS ONE
dc.type.versionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2