Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorClay, T.A.
dc.contributor.authorAlfaro-Shigueto, J.
dc.contributor.authorGodley, B.J.
dc.contributor.authorTregenza, N.
dc.contributor.authorMangel, J.C.
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-31T18:36:33Z
dc.date.available2025-10-31T18:36:33Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12805/5424
dc.description.abstractIncidental mortality (bycatch) in gillnet fisheries is a major threat to many cetacean populations. Acoustic alarms or pingers are a widely adopted management tool used to deter dolphins and porpoises from nets; however, their efficacy is largely species- and fishery-dependent. As such, results from experimental trials may have limited transferability to poorly studied species or fisheries. Here, we investigated the effect of pingers on the behaviour of Burmeister's porpoise Phocoena spinipinnis in the vicinity of the Peruvian small-scale driftnet fleet. Over a 4 yr period (2009-2012), 116 control (without pingers) and 94 experimental (with pingers) fishing sets were observed, and porpoise acoustic activity around nets was recorded using passive acoustic loggers (C-PODs). We modelled variation in detection rates as a function of pinger use and habitat covariates, and found that in regions of preferred habitat associated with cooler (17-18°C), shallow waters (within the 100 m isobath), the use of pingers lead to an 86% reduction in porpoise activity around nets. Our results suggest that pingers are likely to be particularly effective at deterring Burmeister's porpoises from fishing nets, and given the vast capacity of this and other fleets in the region, may substantially reduce mortality. This study also emphasizes the potential of passive acoustic monitoring to determine the effectiveness of bycatch mitigation measures, both for species for which visual observations are scarce, and also in regions where gathering statistically meaningful bycatch rates is logistically challenging.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAcknowledgements. We thank Pro Delphinus staff and fishermen who kindly supported the data collection in the north of Peru and are grateful to the Editor Peter Corkeron and 4 anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. Funding and equipment for the project was provided by Cetacean Society International, Chelonia Ltd., Cleveland Metroparks Zoo, Comisión Permanente del Pacífico Sur, Darwin Initiative, Oak Foundation through Duke University, Rufford Foundation, Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society, as well as Andy Read of Duke University and Per Berggren of Newcastle University. B.J.G. received funding from the Darwin Initiative, the Natural Environment Research Council and the European Union.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherInter-Research
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:0171-8630
dc.rightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.subjectAcoustic Monitoring of Marine Mammal Populationsen_US
dc.subjectBycatch Management and Marine Mammal Conservationen_US
dc.titlePingers reduce the activity of Burmeister's porpoise around small-scale gillnet vesselsen_US
dc.typehttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3354/meps13063
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.06.12
dc.type.otherResearch article
dc.identifier.journalMarine Ecology Progress Series
dc.type.versionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2