Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMunive-Degregori, A.
dc.contributor.authorMayta-Tovalino, F.
dc.contributor.authorLúcar-Flores, C.
dc.contributor.authorMendoza, R.
dc.contributor.authorAlvitez-Temoche, D.
dc.contributor.authorGuillen-Galarza, C.
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-31T18:35:56Z
dc.date.available2025-10-31T18:35:56Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12805/5350
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this article is to evaluate the quality of filling in endodontically treated root canals using the lateral condensation technique and modified lateral condensation technique. Materials and Methods: Thirty-two single-rooted teeth were divided into two groups that were assigned by simple randomization according to the filling technique. Once the endodontic treatment was performed, a periapical radiograph was taken to assess the quality according to the radiographic density and tomography was taken to evaluate the quality according to the tomographic volume of spaces, compared with the post-preparation biomechanical tomography. Finally, we performed a statistical analysis (Student's t-test) to evaluate whether there were differences between the types of filling. Results: Radiographic radiodensity was 182.89 ± 9.81 and 186.72 ± 6.97 HU for teeth treated with the lateral condensation technique and modified lateral condensation technique, respectively. The void volume was 3.75 ± 2.35 and 2.43 ± 1.18 mm 3 for teeth treated with the lateral condensation technique and modified lateral condensation technique, respectively. Conclusion: No significant differences were found between the techniques for both filling quality parameters.en_US
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer (UK)
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:2231-0762
dc.rightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.subjectEndodontics and Dental Regenerationen_US
dc.subjectQuality and Outcomes in Endodontic Treatmentsen_US
dc.titleA comparative evaluation of endodontically treated root canals obturated using gutta-percha with two different protocols: An in-vitro studyen_US
dc.typehttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_113_21
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.14
dc.type.otherResearch article
dc.identifier.journalJournal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry
dc.type.versionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2