Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCabanillas, B.
dc.contributor.authorMallma-Medina, A.
dc.contributor.authorPetkova-Gueorguieva, M.
dc.contributor.authorAlvitez-Temoche, D.
dc.contributor.authorMendoza, R.
dc.contributor.authorMayta-Tovalino, F.
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-31T18:35:56Z
dc.date.available2025-10-31T18:35:56Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12805/5349
dc.description.abstractObjective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of the surface energy of different brands of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) on the adherence of Candida albicans ATCC 10231 in an in vitro study. Materials and Methods: The study had an in vitro, longitudinal, and comparative experimental design. The following groups were made: (1) Vitacryl versus controls (water, dimethyl sulfoxide, glycerol, diethylene glycol, and formamide); (2) Triplex versus the same controls; (3) Vitacryl versus Triplex (surface energy); and (4) Vitacryl versus Triplex (adhesion per cell/field). Adhesion was measured in the area of each field magnified 10 × 10, and with an increase in magnification to 40 × 10, very dense colonies of 0.152 mm2were observed. Results: The surface energy of Vitacryl and Triplex was 40.3 ± 0.3 and 39.5 ± 0.3N/m, respectively, showing statistically significant differences (P 0.001). On the contrary, in relation to the adhesion per cell/field of C. albicans, Vitacryl presented 15.7 ± 1.1, whereas Triplex had 16.7 ± 2.3, with no significant differences (P = 0.058). Conclusion: In relation to the adhesion per cell/field of C. albicans, there was no evidence of significant differences between Vitacryl and Triplex.en_US
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer (UK)
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:2231-0762
dc.rightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.subjectInvasive Fungal Infections and Antifungal Resistanceen_US
dc.subjectCandida Management in Denture Wearers' Oral Healthen_US
dc.titleInfluence of the surface energy of different brands of polymethyl methacrylate on the adherence of Candida albicans: An in vitro studyen_US
dc.typehttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_291_20
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.09.03
dc.type.otherResearch article
dc.identifier.journalJournal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry
dc.type.versionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2