Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRobles, G.
dc.contributor.authorHuertas-Mogollón, G.
dc.contributor.authorMendoza-Martiarena, Y.
dc.contributor.authorAyala, G.
dc.contributor.authorWatanabe, R.
dc.contributor.authorAlvitez-Temoche, D.
dc.contributor.authorMayta-Tovalino, F.
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-31T18:35:43Z
dc.date.available2025-10-31T18:35:43Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12805/5319
dc.description.abstractAim: To compare the application of silane in the bond strength of fiberglass posts in different thirds of the cemented root with a self-adhesive system in an ex vivo study. Materials and methods: Freshly extracted teeth were collected, which had indication of extraction for periodontal or orthodontic reasons. The study evaluated n = 42 specimens that were divided into two large groups: I (control, without silane) and II (with silane); the resistance to adhesion in the respective thirds of the root (cervical, middle, and apical) was also evaluated. The prefabricated fiberglass posts were cemented with and without silane according to the manufacturer's instructions and were cemented with a resin-based cementing agent. The adhesion strength test was evaluated by the universal testing machine. Results: According to the results of this experimental trial, the fiberglass posts that did not receive silane had the highest adhesion strength of 26.5 ± 10.6 MPa, while silane-cemented posts only had 21.7 ± 8.1 MPa. The statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and work with a level of significance of p < 0.05. Conclusion: The use of silane as part of the cementing protocol in fiberglass posts does not influence the adhesion strength between the surfaces of the posts and the resin cement because there were statistically significant differences between both adhesion protocols. Clinical significance: This study has a great impact because according to the results, clinical decisions can be made when cementing the fiberglass posts through the application of silane or not.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAuthors wish to thank to Universidad Nacional de Ingeniería (UNI) and Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Peru, for their invaluable logistic support in the execution of the resistance to the adhesion of each of the specimens evaluated.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherJaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:1526-3711
dc.rightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.subjectMechanical Strength and Bonding in Dental Materialsen_US
dc.subjectMechanical Strength of Fiber Post and Core Restorationsen_US
dc.titleComparison of the resistance of bond strength of cemented fiberglass posts in different root thirds with and without silanization: An ex vivo studyen_US
dc.typehttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2774
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.14
dc.type.otherResearch article
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Contemporary Dental Practice
dc.type.versionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2