Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorThomas, E.
dc.contributor.authorJansen, M.
dc.contributor.authorChiriboga-Arroyo, F.
dc.contributor.authorWadt, L.H.O.
dc.contributor.authorCorvera-Gomringer, R.
dc.contributor.authorAtkinson, R.J.
dc.contributor.authorBonser, S.P.
dc.contributor.authorVelasquez-Ramirez, M.G.
dc.contributor.authorLadd, B.
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-31T18:34:24Z
dc.date.available2025-10-31T18:34:24Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12805/5125
dc.description.abstractEcosystem services of Amazonian forests are disproportionally produced by a limited set of hyperdominant tree species. Yet the spatial variation in the delivery of ecosystem services by individual hyperdominant species across their distribution ranges and corresponding environmental gradients is poorly understood. Here, we use the concept of habitat quality to unravel the effect of environmental gradients on seed production and aboveground biomass (AGB) of the Brazil nut, one of Amazonia’s largest and most long-lived hyperdominants. We find that a range of climate and soil gradients create trade-offs between density and fitness of Brazil nut trees. Density responses to environmental gradients were in line with predictions under the Janzen–Connell and Herms–Mattson hypotheses, whereas tree fitness responses were in line with resource requirements of trees over their life cycle. These trade-offs resulted in divergent responses in area-based seed production and AGB. While seed production and AGB of individual trees (i.e., fitness) responded similarly to most environmental gradients, they showed opposite tendencies to tree density for almost half of the gradients. However, for gradients creating opposite fitness-density responses, area-based seed production was invariable, while trends in area-based AGB tended to mirror the response of tree density. We conclude that while the relation between environmental gradients and tree density is generally indicative of the response of AGB accumulation in a given area of forest, this is not necessarily the case for fruit production.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding text 1: This research was supported by CGIAR Fund Donors, through the CGIAR Research Program on Forests Trees and Agroforestry.; Funding text 2: We are grateful to Carlos Bouroncle, Jheyson Valdivia, and Carolina Alcazar for help with data collection and data curation. Funding. This research was supported by CGIAR Fund Donors, through the CGIAR Research Program on Forests Trees and Agroforestry.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherFrontiers Media
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:1664-462X
dc.rightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.subjectSustainable Resource Management in Ethiopian Forestsen_US
dc.subjectSustainable Management of Brazil Nut Forestsen_US
dc.titleHabitat Quality Differentiation and Consequences for Ecosystem Service Provision of an Amazonian Hyperdominant Tree Speciesen_US
dc.typehttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.621064
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.06.13
dc.type.otherResearch article
dc.identifier.journalFrontiers in Plant Science
dc.type.versionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2