Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVentura-León, J.
dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Villena, A.R.
dc.contributor.authorCaycho-Rodríguez, T.
dc.contributor.authorWhite, M.
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-31T18:34:15Z
dc.date.available2025-10-31T18:34:15Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12805/5100
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Given the profound changes caused in higher education by the COVID-19 pandemic, affecting 1.6 billion students and 63 million educators globally, there arises the necessity for quantifiable measures that capture the essence of academic co-creation. This study aimed to develop and validate a short scale that measures academic co-creation (AC-S) in a sample of higher education students. Methods: A total of 3,169 students from three Peruvian cities participated in the study (Mean Age = 25.77 years old; SD = 8.92 years); 1889 were female (59.60%) and 1,280 (40.40%) males. Qualitative and quantitative procedures were used for test construction. Item response theory (IRT) under the two-parameter graded response model (GRM-2PL) and test information function were used to examine reliability; additionally, a brief measure of academic satisfaction was used to provide evidence of relationship with another variable. Results: The AC-S displayed strong fit and reliability, assessed through the test information function and standard error. It also showed a moderate correlation with academic satisfaction, bolstering its validity by linking with a pertinent variable. Its brevity enhances its practicality for education and research, efficiently fitting explanatory models and educational contexts. Despite substantial sample size and advanced psychometric methods, the study acknowledges limitations in sample representativeness and cross-sectional design. In conclusion, IRT and SEM techniques compellingly support the AC-S’s reliability and validity. Conclusion: The scale’s one-dimensionality, local independence, reliability, and academic satisfaction relationship form a foundation for future exploration of co-creation-based educational models. Further studies should evaluate its performance across diverse cultural contexts.en_US
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherFrontiers Media
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:2504-284X
dc.rightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.subjectPsychometrics and Rasch Analysis in Education Assessmenten_US
dc.subjectItem Response Theory Applicationsen_US
dc.titleAcademic co-creation: development and validation of a short scaleen_US
dc.typehttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1252528
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.03.01
dc.type.otherResearch article
dc.identifier.journalFrontiers in Education
dc.type.versionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2