Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCastañeda, R.
dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez, H.
dc.contributor.authorAponte, H.
dc.contributor.authorOcampo, I.Z.
dc.contributor.authorBussmann, R.W.
dc.contributor.authorPaniagua-Zambrana, N.Y.
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-31T18:34:06Z
dc.date.available2025-10-31T18:34:06Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12805/5070
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Plants sold in public markets are important for the use and economic benefit they generate. This study documents the trade of wild medicinal plants in the district of Lircay, in the southern region of Peru. Additionally, the composition of the wild medicinal species registered in the study is compared with the richness of wild species reported in three markets in the region. Methods: The methodology was based on interviews with 70 vendors between 2015 and 2018. To compare the richness of species between markets, the data was conditioned in a matrix of presence and absence with which the Jaccard similarity index was calculated. Results and Discussion: Seventy-two wild medicinal plants were commercialized for 14 subcategories of medicinal use. The most frequently sold species were Clinopodium brevicalyx, Peperomia galioides and Minthostachys andina. It was also observed that the trade may be influencing the conservation status of Haplorhus peruviana and Ephedra rupestris, both taxa categorized as Critically Endangered according to Peruvian legislation. The problem of species replacement between Equisetum bogotense, Ephedra rupestris and Baccharis genistelloides, which are marketed under the name of "horsetail", is reported. Similarly, Perezia pinnatifida is sold under the common name of "valeriana" and is attributed the properties for the genus Valeriana. Those last observations suggest that an adequate taxonomic identification of the plants sold in public markets is necessary, specially, because of the antagonistic effects that could have different active ingredient of those species. Finally, when comparing the plants sold in Lircay with three other Andean markets (Ancash, Ayacucho and Huancavelica), a low similarity was found, which suggests a high variability of the commercialized plants and the need of more studies to know the total amount of species used for medicinal purposes in this region. Conclusions: The similarity of wild medicinal plants between the Andean markets of Cajamarca, Ancash, Ayacucho and Huancavelica is low.en_US
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherDepartment of Ethnobotany, Institute of Botany, Ilia State University
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:1547-3465
dc.rightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.subjectSDG 15en_US
dc.subjectEthnopharmacology and Biodiversity in Traditional Medicineen_US
dc.subjectTraditional Medicinal Plants and Their Cultural Significanceen_US
dc.titleComparativo-the trade of wild medicinal plants in the andean district of lircay, huancavelica, perú: A comparative studyen_US
dc.typehttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.32859/era.21.22.1-32
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.06.13
dc.type.otherResearch article
dc.identifier.journalEthnobotany Research and Applications
dc.type.versionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2