Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorArteaga-Livias, K.
dc.contributor.authorPanduro-Correa, V.
dc.contributor.authorMaguiña, J.L.
dc.contributor.authorOsada, J.
dc.contributor.authorRabaan, A.A.
dc.contributor.authorLijarza-Ushinahua, K.
dc.contributor.authorBarboza, J.J.
dc.contributor.authorGomez-Gonzales, W.
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez-Morales, A.J.
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-31T18:33:13Z
dc.date.available2025-10-31T18:33:13Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12805/4889
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Surgical site infections (SSI) can be as high in gynecology and obstetrics surgeries compared to other areas. Antimicrobial prophylaxis is an effective tool in the prevention of SSIs; however, it is often not adequately administered, so this study aimed to understand the compliance and factors associated with the use of the clinical practice guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis in gynecological surgeries in two hospitals in the city of Huanuco, Peru. Methods: An analytical cross-sectional study of all gynecologic surgeries performed during 2019 was performed. Compliance was determined based on the antibiotic chosen, dose, administration time, redosing, and prophylaxis duration. Age, hospital of origin, presence of comorbidities, surgery performed, as well as its duration, types of surgery, and anesthesia were considered as related factors. Results: We collected 529 medical records of patients undergoing gynecological surgery with a median age of 33 years. The prophylactic antibiotic was correctly indicated in 55.5% of cases, and the dose was correct in 31.2%. Total compliance with the five variables evaluated was only 3.9%. Cefazolin was the most commonly used antibiotic. Conclusion: Low compliance with the institutional clinical practice guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis was identified, showing that antimicrobial prophylaxis in the hospitals studied was inadequate.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe project was funded by the Universidad Cientfica del Sur. Beca Cabieses 2020-1.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:2079-6382
dc.rightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.subjectSurgical Outcomes and Treatment Strategies for Uterine Conditionsen_US
dc.subjectOptimizing Prophylactic Antibiotic Use in Surgeryen_US
dc.titleCompliance with Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Obstetric and Gynecological Surgeries in Two Peruvian Hospitalsen_US
dc.typehttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12050808
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.01.02
dc.type.otherResearch article
dc.identifier.journalAntibiotics
dc.type.versionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2